FEBRUARY EIPR


February’s sparkly issue of the EIPR has landed on the IPKat’s doormat. Treats in this issue are:

*Nicola Isaacs (University of Plymouth) on whether the UK should scrap its relative grounds search for the registration of trade marks
*Alexander Tsoutsanis (Klos Morel Vos & Schaap) on Art.5(5) of Directive 89/104 and the absence of a “use in commerce” requirement
*Susan Corbett on human rights and IP protection of databases
*Kirstin Huniar on the effect of the Enforcement Directive on UK law
*Li Luo on the legal protection of technological measures in China
*Ron Moscona (Clifford Chance) on Newman v Adlem, the sale of goodwill and the right to use one’s own name
*Adrian Toutoungi (Linklaters) on EFTA and the exhaustion of rights
*Carlo Rusconi (OHIM) on the legality of OHIM’s procedure for notifying decisions by fax
*Claire Howell (Aston Business School) on Goemar and genuine use
*Correspondence between John Tessenshohn (Shusaku Yamamoto) and Yunjoo Lee and Malcolm Langley (QMIPRI) on employees’ inventions
*The usual roundup of book reviews
*Amanda Maclachlan’s (Allen & Overy) review of UK statutory instruments in force.

The IPKat says tuck in!
FEBRUARY EIPR FEBRUARY EIPR Reviewed by Anonymous on Saturday, February 04, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.