IP FOR YOUR LEISURE TIME


March EIPR

March’s tantalising issue of the European Intellectual Property Review has been unleashed. Peel back its cool, grey exterior for the following delights:

*Paul Edward Geller on Dissolving Intellectual Property;
*Joes J Izquierdo Peris (OHIM) on two years of the registered Community design;
*P Akester (Cambridge) and R Akester (UCL) on digital rights management;
*Winifried Tilmann (Lovells) on harmonising EPC and national patent practice;

Cool and grey - just like the EIPR

*Maurice Gonsalves (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) and Patrick Flynn (Banco Chambers) on Australian dilution law;
*Paul Stephenson (St James’s Chambers) on comparative advertising;
*Comments on Oakley v Animal from Martin Howe (8 New Square) and counterfeit goods in South Africa from Lee-Ann Tong (University of Cape Town);
*The usual book reviews and news
*A letter from France – the first in a six-monthly series providing an overview of recent French IP developments .


IPKat film club

Friend of the IPKat Carina Badger has informed the Kat of 2006’s must-see movie for patent pedants, copyright and trade mark everywhere. Snappily titled Intellectual Property, it tells the story of an inventor who must prevent his inventions becoming ‘casualties of the cold war’ (whatever that means). Don’t all rush out at once though – the film isn’t due to be released until August.
IP FOR YOUR LEISURE TIME IP FOR YOUR LEISURE TIME Reviewed by Anonymous on Saturday, February 25, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.